This 2026 guide compares four asset finance aggregators: COG Aggregation, Connective Asset Finance, Fintelligence and Platform Finance. Each gives brokers a route to asset lenders but differs in specialisation, workflow and support.
Choose an asset finance partner for the work the brokerage writes. Compare lender access, submission workflow, support coverage and commercial terms across each aggregator. Provider agreements and panels can change, so confirm the current position before joining.
Eliminate hours of manual data crunching and focus on building relationships with new clients.
Track My Trail makes it easy for brokers to keep track of lost & gained trail, discover clients who have paid off big chunks of their loans, and identify your most profitable clients.
Get Track My Trail for free today – no credit card required.
What Is an Asset Finance Aggregator?
An asset finance aggregator connects accredited brokers with lenders and the systems used to submit, track and settle finance applications. Instead of maintaining a separate commercial relationship with every lender, the broker works through one aggregation agreement for access and operational support.
The agreement can affect fees, commission arrangements, ownership of client records, accreditation and exit conditions. The service may also include training, compliance resources or business support. A broker should read the current agreement and compare the lender panel with the vehicle, equipment or business-purpose deals that clients actually request.
How Asset Finance Aggregation Works
Broker-Aggregator Relationship
The aggregator sits between the brokerage and its lender panels. It gives the broker a submission route and a place to manage accreditations, while lenders gain access to a network of brokers operating under common processes.
This arrangement is useful when a brokerage cannot justify building direct relationships with many asset lenders. The broker can compare suitable products through one network and follow a more consistent process for applications. The client still needs an assessment based on their purpose, financial position and the available lender policy.
Benefits to Brokers
A wider range of asset lenders can help a broker handle more than one deal type without sending every enquiry elsewhere. The practical benefit is choice across uses such as cars, commercial vehicles, machinery and other business equipment, subject to the current panel and each lender’s policy.
Aggregation can also reduce duplicated administration. A shared application system, common accreditation support and accessible deal guidance leave more time for advice and client relationships. The benefit depends on how well those systems fit the brokerage rather than on the number of services listed in a sales presentation.
Types of Asset Finance Aggregators
Generalist vs Specialist Aggregators
A generalist aggregator may support home lending alongside asset and commercial finance. That model can suit a mortgage brokerage that wants one relationship for several lending lines and prefers connected client records across them.
Specialist aggregators concentrate more closely on a particular market or finance type. Their appeal is depth: deal support, lender knowledge and workflows designed around asset transactions. A broker with frequent equipment or vehicle enquiries may prefer that focus, while an occasional asset writer may place more weight on simplicity.
Size and Scope
Large networks may provide a broad panel and established technology. They may also have support teams with defined roles. Scale can help when a brokerage needs consistent coverage across offices or has enough volume to use specialised operational services.
Boutique aggregators may offer closer access to decision-makers and support that reflects a narrower broker group. That can suit a smaller practice that wants direct assistance with unusual deals. The useful comparison is service quality at the times the brokerage needs it, including after submission and during settlement.
Four Asset Finance Aggregators in Australia
The four organisations serve different broker needs. Compare their lender coverage, submission workflow and support against the brokerage’s recent asset finance enquiries before selecting a provider.
COG Aggregation
COG Aggregation is an asset-finance-focused aggregation option. Its role is to connect brokers with asset lenders and support the submission work around those deals. This focus may suit a practice that writes vehicle or equipment finance regularly and wants asset lending to be a defined service line.
The practical distinction to test is the end-to-end application process. Use representative deal types to see how lender selection, document collection and status updates work in practice. Confirm the current lender panel, platform functions, support hours and agreement terms because these can change.
Connective Asset Finance
Connective Asset Finance may appeal to brokers who want asset finance within a broader aggregation relationship. The service can support enquiries spanning vehicles, equipment and personal loans, subject to the products and accreditations available through the current panel.
Have you checked your trail book for missing trail?
Track My Trail makes it easy for brokers to keep track of lost & gained trail, discover clients who have paid off big chunks of their loans, and identify your most profitable clients.
Get Track My Trail for free today - no credit card required.
Its concrete point of difference in this comparison is the connection with the Mercury Nexus workflow. A brokerage already using that environment may benefit from keeping client activity and application work closer together. Check the current integration, asset-finance permissions and any manual hand-offs before making a choice.
Fintelligence
Fintelligence is a specialist asset finance aggregation option for brokers who want a structured route into asset lending. Its panel access and support centre on this type of finance rather than a home-loan-led service.
That narrower focus may suit a brokerage building a dedicated asset finance capability or referring enough deals to bring the work in-house. Ask which lenders cover the brokerage’s common assets and borrower profiles. Training, accreditation time, submission support and the commercial agreement also need a current comparison.
Platform Finance
Platform Finance is presented as a service-led asset finance aggregator. Its job is to help brokers place and progress asset deals, which may suit a practice that values hands-on deal support as much as the technology used for submission.
The distinction worth testing is how the support model works on a difficult or time-sensitive transaction. Compare response paths, lender coverage and the handling of incomplete applications with the other providers. Current costs and service inclusions should be checked before treating support as part of the value.
Additional Notable Aggregators
Other aggregators in Australia may be relevant when these four options do not cover a brokerage’s location, asset types or preferred service model. Before considering another provider, check its current lender panel, agreement terms and broker support against the brokerage’s needs.
Use the four entries as a starting set, then document any gap they leave. A genuine gap might be a lender needed for a recurring client profile, support for a niche asset or a submission process that works with the brokerage’s existing systems.
Asset Finance Aggregation: Eligibility, Benefits and Considerations
Eligibility Criteria for Joining Aggregators
Joining requirements vary by aggregator and by the lender accreditations a broker seeks. The provider may review licensing, professional experience, business structure and expected activity. Individual lenders can apply further criteria before accepting submissions.
Ask for the current onboarding requirements in writing. A broker should know which accreditations are available at the start, what training must be completed and whether a minimum volume applies. Those conditions determine whether the advertised panel will be usable in the brokerage’s first months.
Lender Access and Submission Support
The clearest benefit is access to lenders and a repeatable way to submit asset finance. Support can also help a mortgage broker learn new policies and recognise cases that need specialist handling. These gains are strongest when the service matches real enquiry volume.
Compare each provider against several recent enquiries. Note whether the panel could serve those clients, how much work the platform would remove and where staff would still need manual processes. This reveals more than a feature list because it ties the service to work the brokerage already understands.
Commercial Terms and Platform Fit
Commercial terms need close reading. Compare fees and commission treatment, then examine client ownership, data access, termination provisions and obligations after leaving. Ask how the aggregator handles lender-panel changes that affect active applications.
Technology and support should be assessed as working services, not assumed benefits. A platform can look capable in a demonstration yet create extra steps for the brokerage’s file process. Price any value-added services separately so the total cost is clear.
The Future of Asset Finance Aggregation in Australia
A brokerage should control how new functions enter its workflow. If a platform uses artificial intelligence, ask what data it processes, which decisions remain with the broker and how staff can review an automated result.
Asset types and lender policies will continue to change. A brokerage should therefore look for transparent platform updates, usable training and a clear response when a lender withdraws or changes policy. These qualities make it easier to adapt without rebuilding every internal process.
Conclusion
COG Aggregation, Connective Asset Finance, Fintelligence and Platform Finance each give brokers a route into asset lending, but they differ in focus and workflow. COG and Fintelligence are framed around specialist asset finance. Connective may suit a broker who wants the work tied to a broader aggregation environment, while Platform Finance may suit one who places more weight on service during a deal.
Before choosing, test recent deal types against the current panel and walk one representative application through the proposed system. Then compare the written agreement with the support the brokerage will use. The brokerage can then choose a provider based on its clients and day-to-day work.
